Sunday, December 30, 2007

RIAA becomes more & more like a crazy old uncle.

Or a mad scientist building a time-machine in the basement. Really gone 'round the bend now.

Does the RIAA really want to make itself this irrelevant? Hey, good luck with this one. You're going to need it. Fair is one thing, but desperate and intrusive is another.

Download Uproar: Record Industry Goes After Personal Use

Despite more than 20,000 lawsuits filed against music fans in the years since they started finding free tunes online rather than buying CDs from record companies, the recording industry has utterly failed to halt the decline of the record album or the rise of digital music sharing.
...
Now, in an unusual case in which an Arizona recipient of an RIAA letter has fought back in court rather than write a check to avoid hefty legal fees, the industry is taking its argument against music sharing one step further: In legal documents in its federal case against Jeffrey Howell, a Scottsdale, Ariz., man who kept a collection of about 2,000 music recordings on his personal computer, the industry maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer.

The industry's lawyer in the case, Ira Schwartz, argues in a brief filed earlier this month that the MP3 files Howell made on his computer from legally bought CDs are "unauthorized copies" of copyrighted recordings.

more here ---->
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/28/AR2007122800693.html




No comments: